Putin’s Ideological Shift: Exploring the Influence of Imperial-Minded Authors

Putin’s Ideological Shift: Exploring the Influence of Imperial-Minded Authors
Putin’s Ideological Shift: Exploring the Influence of Imperial-Minded Authors

“How Putin came to hate Ukraine and decided on war” – an investigation by Verstka.

Important points:

  • Initially, the Kremlin bet on Yanukovych, who they called “our son of a bitch”. Russia planned to cozy up to Ukraine, as they did with Belarus, and dissuade Europe from “flirting” with Ukraine.
  • Putin’s attitude towards Ukraine deteriorated along with his relationship with the West. He also believed that the United States was controlling the country.
  • As of January 2014, he had no intention of annexing Crimea. The decision was made spontaneously after the overthrow of Yanukovych’s regime and the failure of the idea to split Ukraine with a center in Kharkiv due to Kernes’ refusal.
  • Putin decided to annex Crimea specifically on the night of February 22-23, after Yanukovych fled from Kharkiv.
  • Putin did not personally initiate the separation of Donbas but was an idea of the FSB.
  • The Minsk agreements were also partly made by Putin. If they had been implemented, they would have served as a model for the entire restructuring of Ukraine.
  • After Zelensky’s presidential election, he tried to “negotiate with Moscow like a human being,” while Putin wanted to impose a “Minsk” benefit to Russia.
  • In 2019, at a meeting in Paris, Putin hoped for the “surrender of Ukraine,” but this did not happen, and Zelensky even mocked him. This was their last meeting.
  • The “last straw” for Putin was the closure of Medvedchuk’s TV channels promoting pro-Russian activity in Ukraine.
  • The decision to prepare for war was made in late February-early March 2021, a year before the war.
  • Kovalchuk convinced him that the West was weak, while Medvedchuk claimed that Ukraine was vulnerable and loyal.

Putin agry

Source: verstka.media

New Philosophy

source: verstka

Along with the change in Putin’s attitude towards the West, internal stories also influenced him. During and after the protests of 2012, Putin began to spend more time alone with books of a certain kind. Conversations began circulating among those close to the Kremlin that Putin was increasingly sitting in archives.

A former Kremlin political technologist says that around this time, a particular working group was even created in the presidential administration to select books and the necessary pages on a given topic for him.
Before the events in Bolotnaya, Putin became interested in the White Guard philosopher Ivan Ilyin.

After the failed protests, the Russian president began to delve much deeper into the texts of authors with views similar to Ilyin’s. He also liked the religious philosopher of the early 20th century, Vasily Rozanov, who was critical of liberals and intellectuals: “I find it better to stand as a policeman at the corner of two streets – more “civil,” more useful, more noble and corresponding to human dignity – than to sit … “behind an intellectual breakfast” and boastfully discuss how “everything is bad with us” and how “we are good,” righteous, honest and “ready to suffer for the truth” …”.

Ilyin, in turn, did not have any reverence for Ukraine as an independent state at all. “Ukraine is recognized as the most threatened part of Russia in terms of separation and conquest,” the philosopher wrote in the Congress of White Emigres resolution in 1938. – Ukrainian separatism is an artificial phenomenon devoid of natural grounds. It arose from the ambition of leaders and international conqueror intrigue.”

Quotes from speeches by Ilyin, Rozanov, and other imperial-minded authors, including contemporary ones, appeared in Putin’s speeches publicly. A technologist familiar with the work of Russian nationalists, who had previously worked in the Kremlin, recognizes in the lessons of the Russian president the influence of moderate Russian nationalist Konstantin Krylov, author of an article on why Russians are constantly mistreated, and even Dmitry Galkovsky, who sees the origins of all Russian rebellions in foreign influence.

“He began to speak almost directly quoting them,” marvels a former Kremlin technologist with a rich past in the circle of moderate nationalists.
“In this pantheon of gods, everything is simply arranged,” says one of the former Kremlin technologists about the techniques. – Ukrainians with trickery, deceit, manipulation, and technology.

Western countries use trickery, deception, manipulation, and technology to grow anti-Russian sentiment among Ukrainians. They could not do so with the Old Believers but succeeded with the Ukrainians. They are the ideal Russians for enemies of Russia. And Ukraine as a state was created and built within the USSR, often at the expense of the Russian population.

Related Articles

Stay Up to Date With The Latest News & Updates

About The Author

5clawTeam has a deep commitment to reporting on conflict zones and war-related issues.. It would help if you saw what’s happening there and how things are in the “trenches” We want to bring into light the ordinary people and their struggle and lean towards that rather than politics. So we will focus more on what people are saying regarding the conflict Russia-Ukraine.